Match Analysis
Monday 06 July 2026 · AI-driven form analysis
Other
leagueUSA
Chicago Red Stars
Home
Utah Royals
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average below 1.3 goals per game and have kept solid defensive shapes. A low-scoring, controlled fixture is expected.
Chicago Red Stars
At home, they average 0.00 goals scored and 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Utah Royals
Away from home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Chicago Red Stars
Home
Utah Royals
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Chicago Red Stars attack is weak at 0.00 goals per game and they scored in 0 of their last 5 matches.
Chicago Red Stars defense is weak at 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Utah Royals attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Utah Royals defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Utah Royals have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Even in tight games, a single set piece or penalty can produce a result that defies the low-goal pattern.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Under 3.5 Goals — 56% confidence from recent form analysis.
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 86/100. Attacking output is limited, goal trend support is low, and defensive structure supports control, supporting the under 3.5 market.
Selected Market
Under 3.5Attacking output is limited, goal trend support is low, and defensive structure supports control, supporting the under 3.5 market.
Selection Score
86/100
Runner Up
Win · 85/100
Selection Reason
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 86/100. Attacking output is limited, goal trend support is low, and defensive structure supports control, supporting the under 3.5 market.
Chicago Red Stars attack stays below 100%
Utah Royals attack stays below 100%
Chicago Red Stars Over 2.5 rate limit
Utah Royals Over 2.5 rate limit
Chicago Red Stars recent scoring is not high volume
Utah Royals recent scoring is not high volume
Combined Over 2.5 trend is low
Combined BTTS trend is low
At least one defensive profile is stable
Market Fit Scores
Under 3.5 Primary
Win ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 24
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 33
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 46
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
West Seattle Junction
Home
Oly Town FC
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
West Seattle Junction have the clearer attacking edge at 2.0 goals per game, while Oly Town FC concede 2.7 per game. The numbers lean toward the focus side without showing total dominance.
West Seattle Junction
At home, they average 2.00 goals scored and 2.50 goals conceded per game.
Oly Town FC
Away from home, they average 0.33 goals scored and 2.67 goals conceded per game.
West Seattle Junction
Home
Oly Town FC
Away
Supporting Reasoning
West Seattle Junction attack is strong at 2.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
West Seattle Junction defense is weak at 2.50 goals conceded per game.
Oly Town FC attack is weak at 0.33 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Oly Town FC defense is weak at 2.67 goals conceded per game.
West Seattle Junction hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 72% confidence from recent form analysis.
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 70/100. West Seattle Junction have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selected Market
Over 1.5West Seattle Junction have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selection Score
70/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 66/100
Selection Reason
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 70/100. West Seattle Junction have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
West Seattle Junction strong attack
West Seattle Junction scored in last 5
Oly Town FC concessions at weak rate
Oly Town FC conceded in last 5
Match environment supports goals
Opponent defense is not too strong for this team-goal line
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 1
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 1
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 37
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Virginia Marauders
Home
Bethesda SC
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Bethesda SC have the clearer attacking edge at 2.7 goals per game, while Virginia Marauders concede 4.0 per game. The numbers lean toward the focus side without showing total dominance.
Virginia Marauders
At home, they average 0.50 goals scored and 4.00 goals conceded per game.
Bethesda SC
Away from home, they average 2.67 goals scored and 2.33 goals conceded per game.
Virginia Marauders
Home
Bethesda SC
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Virginia Marauders attack is weak at 0.50 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Virginia Marauders defense is weak at 4.00 goals conceded per game.
Bethesda SC attack is strong at 2.67 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Bethesda SC defense is weak at 2.33 goals conceded per game.
Bethesda SC hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 76% confidence from recent form analysis.
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 84/100. Bethesda SC have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Bethesda SC have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selection Score
84/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 76/100
Selection Reason
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 84/100. Bethesda SC have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Bethesda SC strong attack
Bethesda SC scored in last 5
Virginia Marauders concessions at weak rate
Virginia Marauders conceded in last 5
Match environment supports goals
Opponent defense is not too strong for this team-goal line
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 2.5 ≥65
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 37
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Ballard FC
Home
Tacoma Stars
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Ballard FC have the clearer attacking edge at 4.5 goals per game, while Tacoma Stars concede 2.0 per game. The numbers lean toward the focus side without showing total dominance.
Ballard FC
At home, they average 4.50 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Tacoma Stars
Away from home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Ballard FC
Home
Tacoma Stars
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Ballard FC attack is strong at 4.50 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Ballard FC defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Tacoma Stars attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Tacoma Stars defense is weak at 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Ballard FC hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Ballard FC have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 76% confidence from recent form analysis.
WIN had the highest score at 86/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selected Market
Over 1.5No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selection Score
86/100
Runner Up
Over 2.5 · 85/100
Selection Reason
WIN had the highest score at 86/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Ballard FC strong attack
Ballard FC stable defense
Ballard FC non-loss rate
Attack edge over opponent
Defensive edge over opponent
Recent scoring trend better than opponent
Opponent shows defensive or attacking weakness
Classification supports a winner profile
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 2.5 ≥65
Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Over 1.5 ≥65
Ballard FC have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 49
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Union Espanola
Home
O'Higgins
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average 1.2 (home) and 1.6 (away) goals per game with open defenses on both ends. Goals are expected from both sides.
Union Espanola
At home, they average 1.20 goals scored and 2.20 goals conceded per game.
O'Higgins
Away from home, they average 1.60 goals scored and 1.60 goals conceded per game.
Union Espanola
Home
O'Higgins
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Union Espanola attack is average at 1.20 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
Union Espanola defense is weak at 2.20 goals conceded per game.
O'Higgins attack is average at 1.60 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
O'Higgins defense is weak at 1.60 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 83% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 85/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Over 1.5BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
85/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 69/100
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 85/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Union Espanola scoring form 80%
O'Higgins scoring form 80%
Union Espanola attack strength 60%
O'Higgins attack strength 80%
Neither team attack < 70%
Union Espanola defense control
O'Higgins defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 80%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 8
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 17
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 33
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
City SC
Home
Redlands
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average below 1.3 goals per game and have kept solid defensive shapes. A low-scoring, controlled fixture is expected.
City SC
At home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 3.00 goals conceded per game.
Redlands
Away from home, they average 1.50 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
City SC
Home
Redlands
Away
Supporting Reasoning
City SC attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
City SC defense is weak at 3.00 goals conceded per game.
Redlands attack is average at 1.50 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Redlands defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Redlands hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Redlands have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Even in tight games, a single set piece or penalty can produce a result that defies the low-goal pattern.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Redlands to Win — 56% confidence from recent form analysis.
WIN had the highest score at 78/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selected Market
WinNo team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selection Score
78/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 73/100
Selection Reason
WIN had the highest score at 78/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Redlands strong attack
Redlands stable defense
Redlands non-loss rate
Attack edge over opponent
Defensive edge over opponent
Recent scoring trend better than opponent
Opponent shows defensive or attacking weakness
Classification supports a winner profile
Market Fit Scores
Win Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 8
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 21
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Connecticut United
Home
Carolina Core
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average 2.4 (home) and 1.4 (away) goals per game with open defenses on both ends. Goals are expected from both sides.
Connecticut United
At home, they average 2.40 goals scored and 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Carolina Core
Away from home, they average 1.40 goals scored and 1.20 goals conceded per game.
Connecticut United
Home
Carolina Core
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Connecticut United attack is strong at 2.40 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
Connecticut United defense is weak at 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Carolina Core attack is average at 1.40 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
Carolina Core defense is average at 1.20 goals conceded per game.
Connecticut United hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Carolina Core have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 66% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 90/100. Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Selection Score
90/100
Runner Up
Over 2.5 · 87/100
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 90/100. Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Connecticut United scoring form 100%
Carolina Core scoring form 80%
Connecticut United attack strength 100%
Carolina Core attack strength 70%
Neither team attack < 70%
Connecticut United defense control
Carolina Core defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 60%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 2.5 ≥65
Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Over 1.5 ≥65
Connecticut United have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 15
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 49
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
San Francisco City
Home
Academica SC
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average below 1.3 goals per game and have kept solid defensive shapes. A low-scoring, controlled fixture is expected.
San Francisco City
At home, they average 0.00 goals scored and 0.00 goals conceded per game.
Academica SC
Away from home, they average 2.00 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
San Francisco City
Home
Academica SC
Away
Supporting Reasoning
San Francisco City attack is weak at 0.00 goals per game and they scored in 0 of their last 5 matches.
San Francisco City defense is strong at 0.00 goals conceded per game.
Academica SC attack is strong at 2.00 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Academica SC defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Academica SC hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
San Francisco City have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Even in tight games, a single set piece or penalty can produce a result that defies the low-goal pattern.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Under 3.5 Goals — 56% confidence from recent form analysis.
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 84/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Under 3.5Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
84/100
Runner Up
Win · 74/100
Selection Reason
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 84/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
San Francisco City attack stays below 100%
Academica SC attack stays below 100%
San Francisco City Over 2.5 rate limit
Academica SC Over 2.5 rate limit
San Francisco City recent scoring is not high volume
Academica SC recent scoring is not high volume
Combined Over 2.5 trend is low
Combined BTTS trend is low
At least one defensive profile is stable
Market Fit Scores
Under 3.5 Primary
Win ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 34
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 35
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 44
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
North Carolina FC U23
Home
Asheville City SC
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Asheville City SC show the better attacking return at 3.5 goals per game compared with North Carolina FC U23 at 1.0, but the gap is not wide enough to call this complete dominance.
North Carolina FC U23
At home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 0.75 goals conceded per game.
Asheville City SC
Away from home, they average 3.50 goals scored and 0.50 goals conceded per game.
North Carolina FC U23
Home
Asheville City SC
Away
Supporting Reasoning
North Carolina FC U23 attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
North Carolina FC U23 defense is strong at 0.75 goals conceded per game.
Asheville City SC attack is strong at 3.50 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Asheville City SC defense is strong at 0.50 goals conceded per game.
Asheville City SC hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 72% confidence from recent form analysis.
WIN had the highest score at 88/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selected Market
Over 1.5No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selection Score
88/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 70/100
Selection Reason
WIN had the highest score at 88/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Asheville City SC strong attack
Asheville City SC stable defense
Asheville City SC non-loss rate
Attack edge over opponent
Defensive edge over opponent
Recent scoring trend better than opponent
Opponent shows defensive or attacking weakness
Classification supports a winner profile
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
Asheville City SC have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 2.5 ≥65
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 2
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 37
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Pacific FC
Home
HFX Wanderers FC
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Pacific FC average 2.0 goals scored and concede 2.0 per game. HFX Wanderers FC average 0.0 scored and 1.5 conceded, so the matchup is decided by fine margins rather than one clear statistical advantage.
Pacific FC
At home, they average 2.00 goals scored and 2.00 goals conceded per game.
HFX Wanderers FC
Away from home, they average 0.00 goals scored and 1.50 goals conceded per game.
Pacific FC
Home
HFX Wanderers FC
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Pacific FC attack is strong at 2.00 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Pacific FC defense is weak at 2.00 goals conceded per game.
HFX Wanderers FC attack is weak at 0.00 goals per game and they scored in 0 of their last 5 matches.
HFX Wanderers FC defense is average at 1.50 goals conceded per game.
Pacific FC hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
HFX Wanderers FC have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 71% confidence from recent form analysis.
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 70/100. Pacific FC have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Pacific FC have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selection Score
70/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 68/100
Selection Reason
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 70/100. Pacific FC have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Pacific FC strong attack
Pacific FC scored in last 5
HFX Wanderers FC concessions at weak rate
HFX Wanderers FC conceded in last 5
Match environment supports goals
Opponent defense is not too strong for this team-goal line
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 10
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 16
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 28
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
FC Cincinnati II
Home
New York Red Bulls II
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
New York Red Bulls II have the clearer attacking edge at 2.4 goals per game, while FC Cincinnati II concede 1.6 per game. The numbers lean toward the focus side without showing total dominance.
FC Cincinnati II
At home, they average 0.20 goals scored and 1.60 goals conceded per game.
New York Red Bulls II
Away from home, they average 2.40 goals scored and 1.40 goals conceded per game.
FC Cincinnati II
Home
New York Red Bulls II
Away
Supporting Reasoning
FC Cincinnati II attack is weak at 0.20 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
FC Cincinnati II defense is weak at 1.60 goals conceded per game.
New York Red Bulls II attack is strong at 2.40 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
New York Red Bulls II defense is average at 1.40 goals conceded per game.
New York Red Bulls II hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 75% confidence from recent form analysis.
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 80/100. New York Red Bulls II have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selected Market
Over 1.5New York Red Bulls II have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selection Score
80/100
Runner Up
—
Selection Reason
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 80/100. New York Red Bulls II have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
New York Red Bulls II strong attack
New York Red Bulls II scored in last 5
FC Cincinnati II concessions at weak rate
FC Cincinnati II conceded in last 5
Match environment supports goals
Opponent defense is not too strong for this team-goal line
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 2
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 7
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 16
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 16
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Houston Dynamo II
Home
Minnesota United II
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average 1.4 (home) and 2.4 (away) goals per game with open defenses on both ends. Goals are expected from both sides.
Houston Dynamo II
At home, they average 1.40 goals scored and 1.80 goals conceded per game.
Minnesota United II
Away from home, they average 2.40 goals scored and 2.20 goals conceded per game.
Houston Dynamo II
Home
Minnesota United II
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Houston Dynamo II attack is average at 1.40 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
Houston Dynamo II defense is weak at 1.80 goals conceded per game.
Minnesota United II attack is strong at 2.40 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
Minnesota United II defense is weak at 2.20 goals conceded per game.
Minnesota United II hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 86% confidence from recent form analysis.
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 92/100. Minnesota United II have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Minnesota United II have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selection Score
92/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 90/100
Selection Reason
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 92/100. Minnesota United II have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Minnesota United II strong attack
Minnesota United II scored in last 5
Houston Dynamo II concessions at weak rate
Houston Dynamo II conceded in last 5
Match environment supports goals
Opponent defense is not too strong for this team-goal line
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Over 2.5 ≥65
Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 16
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 49
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Miami FC
Home
Birmingham Legion
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Miami FC average 3.0 goals scored and concede 3.5 per game. Birmingham Legion average 1.0 scored and 1.0 conceded, so the matchup is decided by fine margins rather than one clear statistical advantage.
Miami FC
At home, they average 3.00 goals scored and 3.50 goals conceded per game.
Birmingham Legion
Away from home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Miami FC
Home
Birmingham Legion
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Miami FC attack is strong at 3.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Miami FC defense is weak at 3.50 goals conceded per game.
Birmingham Legion attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Birmingham Legion defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Miami FC hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Birmingham Legion have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Home team scored in only 2/5 recent games — their attacking reliability is inconsistent.
Away team scored in only 1/5 recent games — BTTS or high-goal markets carry extra risk here.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 71% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 83/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Over 1.5BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
83/100
Runner Up
Over 2.5 · 74/100
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 83/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Miami FC scoring form 100%
Birmingham Legion scoring form 100%
Miami FC attack strength 100%
Birmingham Legion attack strength 50%
Neither team attack < 70%
Miami FC defense control
Birmingham Legion defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 100%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 2.5 ≥65
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 ≥65
Miami FC have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 8
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 40
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Crown Legacy
Home
Orlando City B
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output and consistent scoring trends. This creates a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Crown Legacy
At home, they average 2.20 goals scored and 1.60 goals conceded per game.
Orlando City B
Away from home, they average 2.60 goals scored and 1.80 goals conceded per game.
Crown Legacy
Home
Orlando City B
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Crown Legacy attack is strong at 2.20 goals per game and they scored in 4 of their last 5 matches.
Crown Legacy defense is weak at 1.60 goals conceded per game.
Orlando City B attack is strong at 2.60 goals per game and they scored in 5 of their last 5 matches.
Orlando City B defense is weak at 1.80 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Open matches are volatile: an early goal, red card, or tactical shift can completely change the dynamic.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 2.5 Goals — 86% confidence from recent form analysis.
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 96/100. Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Selected Market
Over 2.5Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Selection Score
96/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 92/100
Selection Reason
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 96/100. Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Crown Legacy attack strength 100%
Orlando City B attack strength 100%
Crown Legacy scoring form 80%
Orlando City B scoring form 100%
Combined Over 2.5 trend is 80%
Match has defensive vulnerability
Profile A (both attack >=100%) or Profile B (attack >=100% and opponent defense <=40%) matches
Market Fit Scores
Over 2.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
Crown Legacy have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 ≥65
Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 22
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 65
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Westchester SC
Home
Boise
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Westchester SC averages 3.3 goals per game while the opponent concedes 3.5 — a clear attacking dominance in recent form.
Westchester SC
At home, they average 3.33 goals scored and 0.67 goals conceded per game.
Boise
Away from home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 3.50 goals conceded per game.
Westchester SC
Home
Boise
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Westchester SC attack is strong at 3.33 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Westchester SC defense is strong at 0.67 goals conceded per game.
Boise attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Boise defense is weak at 3.50 goals conceded per game.
Westchester SC hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Westchester SC have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The weaker team may set up in a compact defensive block and frustrate through rare counter-attacks.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Westchester SC to Win — 94% confidence from recent form analysis.
WIN had the highest score at 91/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selected Market
WinNo team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selection Score
91/100
Runner Up
Over 2.5 · 85/100
Selection Reason
WIN had the highest score at 91/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Westchester SC strong attack
Westchester SC stable defense
Westchester SC non-loss rate
Attack edge over opponent
Defensive edge over opponent
Recent scoring trend better than opponent
Opponent shows defensive or attacking weakness
Classification supports a winner profile
Market Fit Scores
Win Primary
Over 2.5 ≥65
Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Over 1.5 ≥65
Westchester SC have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 49
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Bigfoot FC
Home
Bangers FC
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Bigfoot FC have the clearer attacking edge at 3.0 goals per game, while Bangers FC concede 3.5 per game. The numbers lean toward the focus side without showing total dominance.
Bigfoot FC
At home, they average 3.00 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Bangers FC
Away from home, they average 0.50 goals scored and 3.50 goals conceded per game.
Bigfoot FC
Home
Bangers FC
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Bigfoot FC attack is strong at 3.00 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Bigfoot FC defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Bangers FC attack is weak at 0.50 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Bangers FC defense is weak at 3.50 goals conceded per game.
Bigfoot FC hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Bigfoot FC have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 76% confidence from recent form analysis.
WIN had the highest score at 95/100. Bigfoot FC show the clearest winner edge through stronger attack, steadier defense, better scoring trend, and weaker opposition resistance.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Bigfoot FC show the clearest winner edge through stronger attack, steadier defense, better scoring trend, and weaker opposition resistance.
Selection Score
95/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 84/100
Selection Reason
WIN had the highest score at 95/100. Bigfoot FC show the clearest winner edge through stronger attack, steadier defense, better scoring trend, and weaker opposition resistance.
Bigfoot FC strong attack
Bigfoot FC stable defense
Bigfoot FC non-loss rate
Attack edge over opponent
Defensive edge over opponent
Recent scoring trend better than opponent
Opponent shows defensive or attacking weakness
Classification supports a winner profile
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
Bigfoot FC have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 2.5 ≥65
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 37
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Christos FC
Home
Loudoun United FC 2
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Loudoun United FC 2 have the clearer attacking edge at 3.3 goals per game, while Christos FC concede 1.7 per game. The numbers lean toward the focus side without showing total dominance.
Christos FC
At home, they average 1.33 goals scored and 1.67 goals conceded per game.
Loudoun United FC 2
Away from home, they average 3.33 goals scored and 1.67 goals conceded per game.
Christos FC
Home
Loudoun United FC 2
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Christos FC attack is average at 1.33 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Christos FC defense is weak at 1.67 goals conceded per game.
Loudoun United FC 2 attack is strong at 3.33 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Loudoun United FC 2 defense is weak at 1.67 goals conceded per game.
Loudoun United FC 2 hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 69% confidence from recent form analysis.
BTTS had the highest score at 86/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Over 1.5BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
86/100
Runner Up
Over 2.5 · 79/100
Selection Reason
BTTS had the highest score at 86/100. BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Christos FC scoring form 100%
Loudoun United FC 2 scoring form 100%
Christos FC attack strength 67%
Loudoun United FC 2 attack strength 100%
Neither team attack < 70%
Christos FC defense control
Loudoun United FC 2 defense control
Combined BTTS trend is 67%
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 2.5 ≥65
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 ≥65
Loudoun United FC 2 have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 13
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 49
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
FC Miami City Champions
Home
Miami AC W
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
FC Miami City Champions average 1.3 goals scored and concede 3.0 per game. Miami AC W average 0.0 scored and 0.0 conceded, so the matchup is decided by fine margins rather than one clear statistical advantage.
FC Miami City Champions
At home, they average 1.33 goals scored and 3.00 goals conceded per game.
Miami AC W
Away from home, they average 0.00 goals scored and 0.00 goals conceded per game.
FC Miami City Champions
Home
Miami AC W
Away
Supporting Reasoning
FC Miami City Champions attack is average at 1.33 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
FC Miami City Champions defense is weak at 3.00 goals conceded per game.
Miami AC W attack is weak at 0.00 goals per game and they scored in 0 of their last 5 matches.
Miami AC W defense is strong at 0.00 goals conceded per game.
FC Miami City Champions hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Miami AC W have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Under 3.5 Goals — 70% confidence from recent form analysis.
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 76/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Under 3.5Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
76/100
Runner Up
—
Selection Reason
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 76/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
FC Miami City Champions attack stays below 100%
Miami AC W attack stays below 100%
FC Miami City Champions Over 2.5 rate limit
Miami AC W Over 2.5 rate limit
FC Miami City Champions recent scoring is not high volume
Miami AC W recent scoring is not high volume
Combined Over 2.5 trend is low
Combined BTTS trend is low
At least one defensive profile is stable
Market Fit Scores
Under 3.5 Primary
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 17
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 30
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 32
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 35
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Little Rock Rangers
Home
Louisiana Krewe
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Louisiana Krewe have the clearer attacking edge at 2.0 goals per game, while Little Rock Rangers concede 0.5 per game. The numbers lean toward the focus side without showing total dominance.
Little Rock Rangers
At home, they average 2.00 goals scored and 0.50 goals conceded per game.
Louisiana Krewe
Away from home, they average 2.00 goals scored and 2.50 goals conceded per game.
Little Rock Rangers
Home
Louisiana Krewe
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Little Rock Rangers attack is strong at 2.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Little Rock Rangers defense is strong at 0.50 goals conceded per game.
Louisiana Krewe attack is strong at 2.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Louisiana Krewe defense is weak at 2.50 goals conceded per game.
Neither team has a clear attacking edge on the current numbers.
Little Rock Rangers have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Home defense has been very tight recently (avg 0.5 conceded) — goals against them are harder to come by.
Home team scored in only 2/5 recent games — their attacking reliability is inconsistent.
Away team scored in only 2/5 recent games — BTTS or high-goal markets carry extra risk here.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 2.5 Goals — 69% confidence from recent form analysis.
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 96/100. Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Selected Market
Over 2.5Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Selection Score
96/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 90/100
Selection Reason
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 96/100. Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Little Rock Rangers attack strength 100%
Louisiana Krewe attack strength 100%
Little Rock Rangers scoring form 100%
Louisiana Krewe scoring form 100%
Combined Over 2.5 trend is 75%
Match has defensive vulnerability
Profile A (both attack >=100%) or Profile B (attack >=100% and opponent defense <=40%) matches
Market Fit Scores
Over 2.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
Both teams score consistently and both teams concede often enough, supporting the BTTS market.
Over 1.5 ≥65
Little Rock Rangers have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 65
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Pennsylvania Classics
Home
Reading United A.C.
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average below 1.3 goals per game and have kept solid defensive shapes. A low-scoring, controlled fixture is expected.
Pennsylvania Classics
At home, they average 2.00 goals scored and 5.00 goals conceded per game.
Reading United A.C.
Away from home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Pennsylvania Classics
Home
Reading United A.C.
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Pennsylvania Classics attack is strong at 2.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Pennsylvania Classics defense is weak at 5.00 goals conceded per game.
Reading United A.C. attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Reading United A.C. defense is weak at 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Pennsylvania Classics hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Even in tight games, a single set piece or penalty can produce a result that defies the low-goal pattern.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 56% confidence from recent form analysis.
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 84/100. Pennsylvania Classics have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selected Market
Over 1.5Pennsylvania Classics have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Selection Score
84/100
Runner Up
Over 2.5 · 77/100
Selection Reason
TEAM OVER 1.5 had the highest score at 84/100. Pennsylvania Classics have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Pennsylvania Classics strong attack
Pennsylvania Classics scored in last 5
Reading United A.C. concessions at weak rate
Reading United A.C. conceded in last 5
Match environment supports goals
Opponent defense is not too strong for this team-goal line
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Over 2.5 ≥65
Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Win <65
Below 65% by 11
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 37
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Portland Thorns
Home
Racing Louisville
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Portland Thorns average 1.3 goals scored and concede 0.7 per game. Racing Louisville average 0.5 scored and 1.5 conceded, so the matchup is decided by fine margins rather than one clear statistical advantage.
Portland Thorns
At home, they average 1.33 goals scored and 0.67 goals conceded per game.
Racing Louisville
Away from home, they average 0.50 goals scored and 1.50 goals conceded per game.
Portland Thorns
Home
Racing Louisville
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Portland Thorns attack is average at 1.33 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Portland Thorns defense is strong at 0.67 goals conceded per game.
Racing Louisville attack is weak at 0.50 goals per game and they scored in 1 of their last 5 matches.
Racing Louisville defense is average at 1.50 goals conceded per game.
Portland Thorns hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Portland Thorns have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 1.5 Goals — 71% confidence from recent form analysis.
WIN had the highest score at 77/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selected Market
Over 1.5No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Selection Score
77/100
Runner Up
Under 3.5 · 65/100
Selection Reason
WIN had the highest score at 77/100. No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Portland Thorns strong attack
Portland Thorns stable defense
Portland Thorns non-loss rate
Attack edge over opponent
Defensive edge over opponent
Recent scoring trend better than opponent
Opponent shows defensive or attacking weakness
Classification supports a winner profile
Market Fit Scores
Over 1.5 Primary
Under 3.5 ≥65
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 15
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 19
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 30
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
East Atlanta FC
Home
Birmingham Legion FC 2
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Birmingham Legion FC 2 have the clearer attacking edge at 2.0 goals per game, while East Atlanta FC concede 3.0 per game. The numbers lean toward the focus side without showing total dominance.
East Atlanta FC
At home, they average 1.33 goals scored and 3.00 goals conceded per game.
Birmingham Legion FC 2
Away from home, they average 2.00 goals scored and 1.50 goals conceded per game.
East Atlanta FC
Home
Birmingham Legion FC 2
Away
Supporting Reasoning
East Atlanta FC attack is average at 1.33 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
East Atlanta FC defense is weak at 3.00 goals conceded per game.
Birmingham Legion FC 2 attack is strong at 2.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Birmingham Legion FC 2 defense is average at 1.50 goals conceded per game.
Birmingham Legion FC 2 hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Birmingham Legion FC 2 have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The focus team's output depends on maintaining their current attacking tempo — one off-day shifts the balance.
Away team scored in only 2/5 recent games — BTTS or high-goal markets carry extra risk here.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Over 2.5 Goals — 71% confidence from recent form analysis.
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 87/100. Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Selected Market
Over 2.5Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
Selection Score
87/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 86/100
Selection Reason
OVER 2.5 had the highest score at 87/100. Neither team has a clear winner edge, but both teams show strong attacking output, consistent recent scoring, and a high over 2.5 trend. This is a stronger goal-market profile than win-market profile.
East Atlanta FC attack strength 67%
Birmingham Legion FC 2 attack strength 100%
East Atlanta FC scoring form 100%
Birmingham Legion FC 2 scoring form 100%
Combined Over 2.5 trend is 75%
Match has defensive vulnerability
Profile A (both attack >=100%) or Profile B (attack >=100% and opponent defense <=40%) matches
Market Fit Scores
Over 2.5 Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 ≥65
Birmingham Legion FC 2 have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 1.5 ≥65
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 49
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Ironbound
Home
Staten Island ASC
Away
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Ironbound averages 2.0 goals per game while the opponent concedes 2.0 — a clear attacking dominance in recent form.
Ironbound
At home, they average 2.00 goals scored and 0.33 goals conceded per game.
Staten Island ASC
Away from home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Ironbound
Home
Staten Island ASC
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Ironbound attack is strong at 2.00 goals per game and they scored in 3 of their last 5 matches.
Ironbound defense is strong at 0.33 goals conceded per game.
Staten Island ASC attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Staten Island ASC defense is weak at 2.00 goals conceded per game.
Ironbound hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Ironbound have the stronger defense on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
The weaker team may set up in a compact defensive block and frustrate through rare counter-attacks.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Ironbound to Win — 92% confidence from recent form analysis.
WIN had the highest score at 95/100. Ironbound show the clearest winner edge through stronger attack, steadier defense, better scoring trend, and weaker opposition resistance.
Selected Market
WinIronbound show the clearest winner edge through stronger attack, steadier defense, better scoring trend, and weaker opposition resistance.
Selection Score
95/100
Runner Up
Over 1.5 · 70/100
Selection Reason
WIN had the highest score at 95/100. Ironbound show the clearest winner edge through stronger attack, steadier defense, better scoring trend, and weaker opposition resistance.
Ironbound strong attack
Ironbound stable defense
Ironbound non-loss rate
Attack edge over opponent
Defensive edge over opponent
Recent scoring trend better than opponent
Opponent shows defensive or attacking weakness
Classification supports a winner profile
Market Fit Scores
Win Primary
Over 1.5 ≥65
Ironbound have the best team-goal profile with strong scoring output, recent scoring consistency, and a match environment that still supports two or more goals from one side.
Over 2.5 ≥65
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 13
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Under 3.5 <65
Below 65% by 26
Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Serie B
leagueBrazil
Nautico
Home
Juventude
Away
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Form Analysis
Analysis Summary
Both teams average below 1.3 goals per game and have kept solid defensive shapes. A low-scoring, controlled fixture is expected.
Nautico
At home, they average 0.00 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Juventude
Away from home, they average 1.00 goals scored and 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Nautico
Home
Juventude
Away
Supporting Reasoning
Nautico attack is weak at 0.00 goals per game and they scored in 0 of their last 5 matches.
Nautico defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Juventude attack is weak at 1.00 goals per game and they scored in 2 of their last 5 matches.
Juventude defense is average at 1.00 goals conceded per game.
Juventude hold the clearer attacking edge on the current numbers.
Neither defense has created a major statistical edge on the current numbers.
Risks & Considerations
Moderate confidence — treat this as a cautious pick and consider additional context.
Even in tight games, a single set piece or penalty can produce a result that defies the low-goal pattern.
Final Recommendation
Primary pick: Under 3.5 Goals — 56% confidence from recent form analysis.
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 74/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selected Market
Under 3.5Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Selection Score
74/100
Runner Up
—
Selection Reason
UNDER 3.5 had the highest score at 74/100. Under 3.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Nautico attack stays below 100%
Juventude attack stays below 100%
Nautico Over 2.5 rate limit
Juventude Over 2.5 rate limit
Nautico recent scoring is not high volume
Juventude recent scoring is not high volume
Combined Over 2.5 trend is low
Combined BTTS trend is low
At least one defensive profile is stable
Market Fit Scores
Under 3.5 Primary
Win <65
Below 65% by 2
No team showed the clear superiority required for a win market.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 11
No team met the attack, scoring, and match-environment requirements for team over 1.5.
Over 1.5 <65
Below 65% by 22
BTTS market conditions were not satisfied.
Over 2.5 <65
Below 65% by 39
Over 2.5 market conditions were not satisfied.
Legend